I don't know how much companies think of security in general. Obviously, with the case with Crowdstrike, they don't seem to consider the possible consequences of their implemented security.
This is just my opinion but it feels like there is much scare tactics to get companies to implement over-zealous monitoring systems that unnecessarily infringe on the employees privacy. They implement spyware to prevent spyware. It seems a bit counter-intuitive to me.
Interesting take here. Do you think most companies overestimate how much security closed code gives?
I don't know how much companies think of security in general. Obviously, with the case with Crowdstrike, they don't seem to consider the possible consequences of their implemented security.
This is just my opinion but it feels like there is much scare tactics to get companies to implement over-zealous monitoring systems that unnecessarily infringe on the employees privacy. They implement spyware to prevent spyware. It seems a bit counter-intuitive to me.
Appreciate your perspective Karl, the balance you mention between security and privacy is important. Let's connect and share more insights!